Lawmaker wants you to have right to carry in Tennessee restaurants
Save Email Print
Updated: 9:52 PM Jan 8, 2008
Lawmaker wants you to have right to carry in Tennessee restaurants
Knoxville (WVLT) -- Should you be allowed to carry a gun into a restaurant that serves alcohol? At least one state senator thinks so. Volunteer TV's Rob Pratt is here to explain what the proposed change in the law could mean and what people think of it. Tennessee Senator Doug Jackson, from Dixon, expects to introduce the bill Wednesday. It comes less than two weeks after the deadly shooting at Hooter's in Knoxville. While some hope the new law could help prevent such tragedies, others say guns should not be on the menu at all.
Posted: 5:30 PM Jan 8, 2008
Font Size:

Knoxville (WVLT) -- Should you be allowed to carry a gun into a restaurant that serves alcohol?

At least one state senator thinks so.

Volunteer TV's Rob Pratt is here to explain what the proposed change in the law could mean and what people think of it.

Tennessee Senator Doug Jackson, from Dixon, expects to introduce the bill Wednesday.

It comes less than two weeks after the deadly shooting at Hooter's in Knoxville.

While some hope the new law could help prevent such tragedies, others say guns should not be on the menu at all.

If you are eating at Beef 'O' Brady's, or any other Tennessee restaurant that serves alcohol, you can't bring a gun inside.

But that could change.

It's just a bill right now, but if it becomes law, those with permits could bring a gun in, as long as they are not the one's drinking.

Beef 'O' Brady's owner Mike Peacock says that's a bad idea.

"I don't want to sit and wander how many of my customers actually have guns on them."

People may be secretly bringing guns into restaurants with bars now. But they face time in jail if they are caught. Changing that could put restaurant owners in a difficult position.

Peacock says, "I'm not against people having the right to bear arms, but doing it in an establishment like this is uncalled for."

The customers we talked to worry about winding up in the line of fire.

Neva Bowerman calls the proposed law dangerous and says, "I believe everyone ought to be able to carry a gun, but I think that bringing it out to where alcohol is being served might be very dangerous."

Trevor Putnam says, "I think that's a good idea."

Putnam sells guns and operates a shooting range at Coal Creek Armory. He says the law would not cause problems, because it limits gun-toting to those who have gone through the process to get a permit.

"There's already a federal law against carrying a firearm while intoxicated. I don't think preventing people who aren't drinking from carrying in restaurants is going to make anybody any safer."

Even if the bill passes, individual restaurants could still choose to ban weapons inside if they post the proper signs.

Still, restaurants could end up in the line of fire in a public relations sense, caught between customers with very different views.


Latest Comments

Posted by: Jared Location: Culleoka, TN on Feb 13, 2009 at 08:18 AM

It is a fact that there are people out there that carry wrongfully, and if one of those people were in a restaurant drinking, gets mad and pulls out his gun and starts shooting the place up. Then everyone in that restaurant is a sitting duck, just because someone thinks it's wrong for a man to carry a gun leagally.It is hard for a man to change his mind when he is already laying in a coughen, about the idea of leagally carrying a gun in a restaurant. Ask yourself how you would feel if you were sitting in a restaurant when a shooting occured. Your child was injured or killed, and the guy next to you had a permit, but his weapon was in the car because he is not allowed to carry in a restaurant that serves alcohol.
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: Roy Location: Chicago suburb-soon Nashville on Apr 24, 2008 at 06:34 PM

I am moving out of Illinois largely because of the alternating "chicken little"-"ostrich" mentality of the Chicago dominated politics. I wonder why the anti-gun opinions ALWAYS ignore the facts that the person LEGALLY carrying is prohibited from consuming alcohol and that many other states have ALREADY PASSED SIMILAR LAWS without problem. I have yet to find ONE person with an antigun opinion that can rationally argue their point. They are consumed with emotion and somehow feel that because some of us would willingly accept the responsibilities that come with arming oneself that we would demand ALL OTHERS to do the same. WE DO NOT! In fact, if you are at all uncomfortable with a firearm LEAVE THEM BE! But you may want to have one of us near if you are violently accosted because the chances of having a policeman near enough is slim and courts have determined that THE POLICE DON'T HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT THE INDIVIDUAL! Think about it!
[ Report Abuse ]
Posted by: Henry Location: SC on Mar 22, 2008 at 03:01 PM

Guns yes, but only if they bring roses too. I have always felt restaurants should have several sections. Kids and no kids. Drinking and non-drinking. Smoking and non-smoking. Loud laughing groups and people who just want to enjoy each others company and a good meal. And now of course, guns or no guns, with perhaps some bullet proof partitions. And pick up a bullet proof vest as you come in the door. And the roses? Well for the funerals of course. On second thought, maybe I'll just get someone to deliver a pizza to my door.
[ Report Abuse ]
Currently
Local Radar
Radar