Home ·  Classifieds ·  MyVLT2.com ·  VolTV2Go.com ·  Volzeye.com ·  Desktop Alert
Mary Winkler Sentenced to Jail Save Email Print

A | A | A

Selmer, Tennessee (WVLT) Knoxville native Mary Winkler will go to jail in connection with the killing of her minister husband.

A judge sentenced Winkler to three years of split confinement in connection with the shotgun slaying of her husband in March of 2006.

Of that, she’s been ordered to serve 210 days in jail.

Up to 60 days can be served in a mental health care facility.

The judge ruled she will get credit for time served, and Winkler will begin serving her sentence immediately.

She was taken into custody at the conclusion of the hearing.

The judge denied Winkler's defense attorney's request that she be granted judicial diversion on her conviction of voluntary manslaughter

Attorney Leslie Ballin told the judge during testimony today that, "If (Mary's) not divertable, who is?"

Mary Winkler also made a short statement during today's sentencing.

She addressed her husband's family, saying "I understand you're angry with me," but said she prays for them every night to have peace.

She also said she thinks of her dead husband every day said she will always love and miss him.

She asked the judge to let her go home today and be with her children, but also said whatever sentence she receives will never punish her enough.

Winkler, 33, went on trial for first-degree murder in April, but a jury found her guilty of the lesser crime of manslaughter after she testified she was physically and emotionally abused by her husband, Matthew Winkler.

(The Associated Press contributed information to this story. All rights reserved.)

More Stories
Still Streaking

UPDATE: Parents, students on edge about Austin-East guns

Firings recommended in Knox Co. student's death

City of Knoxville considering move to take torched downtown warehouses

Tennessee EMS crews headed to Gulf Coast to aid evacuations

Newly-elected Knox Co. officials sworn in

Police search for suspect in string of Knoxville robberies

Forecasters: Gustav strengthens into a hurricane

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: David Location: washington dc on Mar 7, 2008 at 02:31 PM
There was a great write-up on Google Answers on how to research a jail sentence...when the sentincing took place, how long a criminal is sentenced for, where they are in the prison system, and so on. It's a terrific resource for anyone interested in that sort of information. You can find it at: How was a criminal case settled and sentenced? http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=357523 Worth a look! .

Posted by: John Location: New York on Sep 22, 2007 at 12:15 PM
Think about what would happen if a man shot his wife in the back while he was sleeping because he 'snappped' under the pressure of his job. There would be NO WAY that he would get sentenced to only 210 days in jail. NO WAY. He would be sentenced to life in jail and never get to see his family again. I hope this woman goes to jail for the rest of her life for the evil crime she has commited. And please don't post those disgusting comments. I'm 12, not retarded.

Posted by: claytone Location: toronto ontario on Aug 1, 2007 at 01:50 AM
and anonymous, how do you know not one man would give her help? did she even try? im sure they all would have done their best, but no she shoots him in the back. screw this woman, I hope she gets killed in prison. but then again she won't because she'll be surrounded by stupid feminists

Posted by: clayton Location: toronto ontario on Aug 1, 2007 at 01:48 AM
she shot him in the back with a shotgun while he slept... that is horrible, despicable, evil. this woman deserves life just like anyone else who ever did this. if a shrimpy, wuss of a man did this to his big strong tough wife for the same reasons, he wouldn't get any breaks. he would go away for life, just like this scum should. she should never be allowed near her children again. I hope somebody takes vigilante justice into their own hands when she gets out of prison and paints the pavement with this pigs brains.

Posted by: Adam Location: Dallas, Tx on Jun 22, 2007 at 09:40 PM
I am not sure which is sicker, this distgusting sentence or the fact that people responding this article seem to be okay with allowing Ms. Winkler to raise her children!!

Posted by: Cassie Location: Victoria, TX on Jun 18, 2007 at 03:09 PM
It is so incredibly easy to judge when you have never been there. No murder is not right, but neither is spousal/verbal/physical abuse. To say there was no proof, can you not understand that she was trying to keep everything balanced inside her family without airing her dirty linen so to speak? At some point, the pressure became great and she snapped. I for one hope she serves her time and is able to raise her children. She deserves a chance for peace; something her ex-husband would never have allowed. I'm sorry he is dead, but very glad that a 12-person jury and judge did not punish her more. I am not saying she was correct. I am saying she lived with more hell than anyone will admit. She deserves freedom and help; not condemnation.

Posted by: Brian Location: Oregon on Jun 13, 2007 at 08:07 AM
West-great logic! Questioning = acceptance. Let's blame those pesky men again. Heck if they and their sons would just go away.........

Posted by: jack Location: Washington on Jun 12, 2007 at 04:08 PM
It's easy to see the histrionics of the winkler apologists. Just witness the fine example of logic demonstrated by anonymous from the West. People (Oh make that those awful men) question the fact there was no evidence of abuse. This leads this persons logical mind to actually link that to the acceptance of abuse. What! Great thinking. How you linked these disparate ideas is beyond me.

Posted by: Anonymous Location: West on Jun 10, 2007 at 11:49 PM
It is easy to determine that men believe abuse is acceptable. Each one writing in this forum do not believe her--that's is exactly why she killed him. Where could she turn--it would have to be to another male(I won't say "man") whether, policeman, elder, sheriff, etc. You get it she would have to "tell" a M A L !!!! Not one of them would have given her help or escape. So, the fact that she killed him is proof of the kind of person he was!!

Posted by: Jack Location: Washington on Jun 10, 2007 at 01:42 PM
Why lose half the assets, pay for a divorce lawyer, fight for custody, and deal with the old man when you can just kill him and take a six month break in jail

Posted by: Ryan Waxx Location: PA on Jun 10, 2007 at 12:30 AM
There should never be a get-out-of-jail free card for any segment of society, weather that segment is millionaries, politicans, or a ethnic or gender group. Do the apologists claim that we don't have enough shelters for battered women? Society has done its part to remove the excuses... but certain shameless cretins will excuse any atrocity, no matter the actual circumstances, as long as the killer is from the 'right' group and the victim is from the 'wrong' group. This is why identity politics is fundamentally amoral and always eventually results in the abolition of the rule of law in favor of the rule of the politically connected group of the moment.

Posted by: Debbie Bass Location: Selmer, TN on Jun 9, 2007 at 06:41 PM
I know that Church of Christ preachers are suppose to have the well being of other in their heart but I also know that they are not perfect. No one, I mean no one knows what this lady has been through. My sister was married to a Church of Christ minister. However, the Lord has helped her out of this marriage. She was abused and her children were also abused. The Church of Christ ministers think their spouse are to be perfect. Guess what, the only perfect one is sitting on the right hand of God and He is the judge. I also have a first cousin that has been married to a Church of Christ man but she has gotten out of this because of his abuse. And, I lived in an abusive situation and my husband died of cancer and he wasn't a believer until two weeks before he died. So religion is not the biggest part of an abuse, it all stems from wanting to control your spouse. I believe with my whole heart that this made her do what she did. You are fearful of your life and childrens life when you are in an abusive situation. You are too scared to leave and you are to afraid to stay. What a life. Just wanted to say I believe that murder is wrong but I also know that when you are abused your mind doesn't always know what is going on. Thanks.

Posted by: Pat Location: Marshall Cty, AL on Jun 8, 2007 at 09:09 PM
Well, next time my husband gets a little ornery with me, he'd better watch out! Now we women know how to kill our husbands and get away with it - just fix ourselves up to look pitiful and tell the judge what a jerk he was - how we had no choice but to shoot the rascal. The jurors in this trial must have studied the OJ jurors for guidance. This sentence is abominable.

Posted by: Jeff Location: Karns on Jun 8, 2007 at 08:54 PM
She was treated like a slave ***** pardon my text and no 1 should be done like that against there will.....no one

Posted by: Bernice Location: Brown on Jun 8, 2007 at 07:02 PM
She should have got more time in jail and my opinion is she is definetly guilty not carzy or mental just plain mean and should got death penalty.

Posted by: Marcus Location: Houston, TX on Jun 8, 2007 at 06:32 PM
How did this miscarriage of justice occur? Is the legal system completely broken? Can a woman simply cry abuse and get away with cold blooded murder? I certainly hope that before the judge gave her this joke of a sentence he was presented with concrete physical evidence of horrible longterm abuse by her husband. Abuse so severe that she was psychologically incapable of leaving and in fear of her very life. I'm talking about police reports of domestic violence, medical reports from hospitals that substantiate injuries consistent with abuse, and eyewitness testimony that verifies a history of abuse. Anything short of this means a murder was given a slap on the wrist and justice has been thwarted. I don't know all the facts of this case, so maybe this light sentence was justified, but if this is simply a result of her unsubstantiated claims of abuse, then she and the judge deserve long prison sentences.

Posted by: Jeff Location: Knoxville on Jun 8, 2007 at 06:17 PM
This is an utter travesty. Unfortunately, commenting does little good, as I'm sure the judge stubbornly believes he did the right thing in sentencing her to LESS THAN SIX MONTHs in jail for killing a man while he was sound asleep. What was her justification? Her husband "made" her don a wig and highheels, and he wanted sex -- with is WIFE -- that she deemed improper. Sure, I can see how this might justify murder. After all, she had no recourse to this unspeakable torture other than blasting him with a shotgun while he was asleep. Justice was not served. But what's worse, the very concept of justice was gravely wounded. The judge ought to be impeached, and he certainly should not be reelected.

Posted by: Frank Location: Long Beach, IN on Jun 8, 2007 at 05:54 PM
This sentence is an outrage. All a woman has to say is that she is abused and she's home free. She doesn't even have to produce evidence that it's true.

Posted by: Kathy Location: Knoxville on Jun 8, 2007 at 04:48 PM
I felt that from the very beginning regarding Mary Winkler that she was innocent. I have alway's hoped she would not be in prison the rest of her life. She was just a lady that had been abused and more than likely suffered years of mental and physical distress. I hope that she has a healthy life with her children something I believe she truly never had. May God Bless you Mary.

Posted by: Anonymous on Jun 8, 2007 at 01:04 PM
I don't think she deserves the kid, they probably fear for their lives. I think the Jusctice system real let us down with respect to Mary Wrinkler's verdict. You do not shot someone when they are sleeping and say it was an accident. Why did she get off so easy. She could have ask for a DIVORCE.

Posted by: Brenda Location: Grainger on Jun 8, 2007 at 10:59 AM
I was married to this man for almost 33 years and all of this time I had mental and physical abuse, we had 2 children together and they would have to listen to him fuss harshly and hit me more times than I can count. I know that one time when he came in drinking he started pushing and shoving me and yelling at me , just because he wanted to, that I just about lost my common sense and I could have done something bad but I can see Mary Winkler feelings if this man of her`s was like mine. I went to get a divorce twice and paid both lawyers and my husband then told me that he would change and I would take him back. I stayed with him because of the kids having a daddy and I kept telling my husband then that if he did not change that when the kids were 18 I was going to leave him. I kept believing him that he would change and he didn`t go in March of 1999 I left him and divoreced him and thank the Lord that nothing like the Winklers happened , but I can see Mary`s position. You can do things when under pressure that you would not think that you could do. Today I am happier than I have ever been and NO MORE MARRIAGES for me.I think Mary was under too much pressure from her so called husband.

Posted by: Kyle Location: Knoxville on Jun 8, 2007 at 10:57 AM
No abuse proven and she gets off with a slap on the rist.

DAYS HRS MINS SECS