Home ·  Classifieds ·  MyVLT2.com ·  VolTV2Go.com ·  Volzeye.com ·  Desktop Alert
TVA discusses pros and cons of nuclear power Save Email Print
Posted: 10:43 PM Mar 24, 2008
Last Updated: 7:44 AM Mar 25, 2008
Reporter: Mike McCarthy

A | A | A

Knoxville (WVLT) - A nuclear war of words was launched in Knoxville.

The Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church hosted a public forum on the pros and cons of nuclear power Monday night. It centered on TVA's decision to complete it's second nuclear unit at the Watts Bar Plant and possibly build a new plant in Alabama.

Volunteer TV's Mike McCarthy was at the forum and as the story.

It's nuclear war....at least of words.

"There's a number of reasons we're concerned," said Stephen Smith of the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.

"Nuclear power can play an important role in energy transformation," said Jerry Paul, Distinguished Fellow on Energy Policy.

Knoxville's Unitarian Universalist Church hosted the "Nuclear Power: Pro and Con" discussion Monday night. The reason: TVA's role in the nationwide reactor revival. TVA has three nuclear power plants. It's committed to completing the two-point-five billion dollar unit two reactor at the Watts Bar Plant. Also, it's considering a seven to nine billion dollar new plant in Bellefonte, Alabama.

"I think it can be one component of developing a broader package of emmission-free, clean, safe, baseload energy," Paul said.

Jerry Paul's with UT's Howard Baker Junior Center for public policy. He doesn't side with TVA or any program, but points to France's heavy reliance on nuclear power as to why it can be good.

"They, for that, have the cleanest energy in Europe and the cheapest energy in Europe," Paul said.

Stephen Smith's with the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy. He says nuclear power takes too much money, too much water, and makes too much waste.

"We would like to see a greater investment in renewables because the reality is TVA already gets 20 percent of it's power from nuclear power," Smith said.

TVA couldn't talk on camera, but says an annual two-percent power demand increase makes nuclear investment necessary.

"TVA's been here. at that time they were going to build 17 nuclear power plant. They only got 8 or 9 up and running, and it cost 20 plus billion dollars, we're still paying for that," Smith said.

Everyone can agree....energy conversation will save TVA and you money.

TVA hasn't officially decided to build the Bellefonte plant. It's just trying to get the license for the option.

If all goes smoothly, TVA will could it in three and half years. Construction could be done around 2018.

Email  del.icio.us   Google   Yahoo  digg
More Stories
Alexander Proposes Manhattan Project-style paln for clean energy independence

Report: Two killed when plane goes down in North Carolina

John Edwards praises Obama, doesn't endorse

Tennessee high school students to work on 'Hannah Montana' movie set

McCain disputes blogger report that he voted against Bush

US official says Myanmar to allow 1 U.S. relief shipment

THP investigating three-car crash in Union County

East Tennessee rains help, but Buffalo Mountain still burning

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Karen Hadden Location: SEED Coalition on Mar 26, 2008 at 07:41 PM
Nuclear plants would divert funding needed for energy efficiency and renewable energy, such as solar and wind power, safe solutions to the global warming problem that we can put in place today. Nuclear power uses huge amounts of water, and Browns Ferry had to shut down last year due to drought. Worst of all, there is no storage solution to radioactive waste. Exposure to radionuclides can cause cancer, and the ultimate catastrophe, a meltdown, could cost thousands of lives. The security risks are great. Cleaner, safer energy is needed for our future.

Posted by: E Location: Knoxville on Mar 25, 2008 at 12:42 PM
We need solutions to climate change NOW. A nuclear plant built in 2018 is not a solution . Conserving energy TODAY will have the greatest benefit for ratapayers and for reducing global warming pollution.

AP Videos
Business Connections Tile