Home ·  Contact Us ·  Classifieds ·  MyVLT2 ·  VolTV2Go ·  Volzeye ·  Desktop Alert
Home▼
Weather▼
News▼
Sports▼
Business▼
Lifestyle▼
Directories▼
Entertainment▼
Opinion▼
Inside▼
Tennessee could lose money if juveniles aren't added to sex offender registry Save Email Print
Posted: 5:44 PM Aug 18, 2008
Last Updated: 7:47 AM Aug 19, 2008

A | A | A

KNOXVILLE, Tenn. (WVLT) -- Juvenile offenders are among those you won't find on the Tennessee Sex Offender Registry, but that could now result in the state losing hundreds of thousands of dollars.

After a federal law was passed, part of the deal requires states to put juveniles on the registry, and if they’re not added, states face a 10-percent cut in federal law enforcement funds.

If you look on the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation Web site for sex offenders in your area, you'll find them, unless they’re juvenile offenders.

State Senator Tim Burchett says, "They need to be on that list because that's definitely not something when they turn 18 that they're just going to get over."

Sen. Burchett says talk of cost has prevented previous legislation from passage. But now the talk of loss of funding in a new federal law could change that. Kristin Helm with the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation says the state receives about seven million in federal funds for law enforcement.

Helm says, "If those states that are not in compliance with the Adam Walsh Act by 2009 will receive a ten percent reduction in those funds."

Helm says Knoxville has a poster child of a case to show the need to be in compliance.
Grant Anthony Friese was just 14 when he was convicted of molesting a six year old. In two other states he was registered on their sex offender registries....but then he moved to Tennessee.

Helm says, “He was not required to register because we do not require juveniles to register."

In recent months, Friese was sentenced to 40 years after pleading guilty to raping three women, and attempting to rape a fourth woman at area coin laundry mats.

Sen. Burchett says, "Unfortunately with child molester cases you don't see any big change coming until the state is embarrassed by a situation."

With the threat of federal funding cut, Burchett expects passage of the legislation to put juveniles on the registry.

Helm says only those juveniles at least fourteen and those convicted of serious sexual offenses would be required to register to meet the new federal law.

More Stories
"The Santa Train" makes its rounds in Kentucky, Tennessee and Virginia

2nd Annual Cross Knox 15K races money for Knoxville's scenic Greenways

KARM assembles 1,300 Thanksgiving baskets for Knoxville families in need

Calhoun paper plant to have week of downtime

Nissan says buyout program met goals

Police respond to overnight quadruple shooting

East Tenn. aglow over nuclear growth

Lobbying efforts cost up to $65M in Tennessee

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 20, 2008 at 03:25 PM
The world is over populated as it is so we should enforce capital punishment for all rape and death crimes regardless of age.

Posted by: sam Location: arizona on Aug 19, 2008 at 09:49 PM
A sex offender at such a young age is more often than not a victim themselves. Children are curious and they do curious things. A true offender should definately be watched, but what is a serious offense there? Kissing petting? Forced sexual contact I can see. Anything consituting rape As well. In Arizona there is a registry that has free access; there is a map and the photo of the perp along with their crime. I believe there was a national registry that put together the site for Arizonans. I would pull it up and see who constructed the site and contact them to ask them to do the same.

Posted by: Nicole on Aug 19, 2008 at 06:42 PM
The problem locally is with DCS and the D.A's office.Although the police who are already under payed will feel the cuts! A 19 year old who can't say no to a 12 year old is a deviant. The Senator's comments were right on, he has obviously done his research. A good portion of these kids do not change and they get under the radar long enough to rack up many more victims before they are caught. The rehab they give these offenders does not work and the people involved know it. This is why we have a epidemic of this behavior in our country.The professionals know this diviant behavior starts in youth. I wish the media would be much more ruthless in covering this issue and investigate our local government in handling it from the ground up! I assure you the average viewer would be outraged to know what really goes on and who sits next to their child at school waiting to pounce!

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 19, 2008 at 03:15 PM
I don't think it should mwtter if they are an adult or child. If you rape, kill or seriously harm another human being you should pay alot more than just being put on a stupid list. Any of these acts greatly effect the person they done to, so why give them a second chance? There are alot of good people out there who deserve a second chance- rapists and killers are not one of them. they deserve capital punishment(adult or child)

Posted by: Tim Location: Knoxville on Aug 19, 2008 at 12:24 PM
YOU ARE NOT GOING TO BE AT A LOSS OF ANY MONEY! The federal goverement is ending the type of grants that the Adam Walsh Act said the money would be taken from. Juveniles have no place on the sex offender registry.

Posted by: johnnie Location: new tazewell tn on Aug 19, 2008 at 08:48 AM
i think every one that is a offender should be on the list. and i think the list should be posted to where every body can see it free. i have tried to find the list of offenders but everything i go into they wont you to pay for it. i think it should be free to every one because i think there is a offender living close to me but i can not get into the site to find out for sure. i would really like to no which site you go into to see the offenders for free so i would no if anybody can help i would really appreciate it.

Posted by: joan Location: knoxville on Aug 19, 2008 at 06:57 AM
This is a disorder. Juveniles do not change just like the adults and there is NO pill. When you work with them for years you observe that they sooner or later offend again. I suspect Greg and Hammy know very little about this disorder.

Posted by: Bobbie Location: Oak Ridge on Aug 19, 2008 at 12:17 AM
Person who truly violates with penetration and or force & found guilty should be labled as true sex offenders. Those that are caught in a trap because of a touch or petting act, esp a teen infatuation is not a sex offender. Our laws on such issues is a money trap. We have innocent youth having to pay for an act that isn't theirs. And true sex, rapist will escape because they know how to work the system. A teenager bearly 19 who has a 12 going on 20 acting girl pushing herself on him shouldn't have to be entrapped into this system. And school or law official who pursue this as a sexual offence is contributing to ruining a health normal teens life before him or her even has a chance. Not to mention the cost the family endures, nor the pain and suffering both girl and boy face because they were a bit too friendly with each other. These matters should be handled by the family not a school board, local police or State Grand Jury. Ask yourself if this was your teenager.

Posted by: Hammy on Aug 18, 2008 at 07:28 PM
This is so stupid. Juveniles usually get their act together after doing stupid things like this. Especially the ones who got in trouble. It scares them into doing right. They didn't know better most of the time. The international community agrees with this, why not the US? Human Rights Watch did an article on it. It is actually against international law. US has gone way to far this time, and it will pay for it.

Posted by: greg Location: knoxville on Aug 18, 2008 at 07:09 PM
I'm sorry is Mr. Burchett a doctor who can diagnose whether or not people can be cured from disorders like pedophilia or schizophrenia maybe he can just say they will never be cured and just lock them up like 16 15 or 14 or 13 year olds who may be sick...let's let the man with no formal education and or degree to diagnose and comdemn. I think you owe it to your viewers to deny your passive backing of his comments by running them at all. Equal reporting means you should get a more professional opinion represented.

Posted by: Donna Location: New Tazewell on Aug 18, 2008 at 06:05 PM
Yes, I do think that ALL sex offenders should be added to the registry.

VolunteerTV.com Most Discussed